SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12270

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
M V BHUVANESWARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 8581/2026



##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:35646 APHC010170952026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 8581/2026 Between:

1. M V BHUVANESWARI, W/O VEMANNA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O KONDLAPALLI VILLAGE, MOKAKALMUR TALUK STATE OF

KARNATAKA.

2. M .V. SARITHA,, W/O M. SHIVARAJ, BELLARY CITY, BELLARY DISTRICT, STATE OF KARNATAKA.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENU(ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-

522238

2. T HE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P-522238

3. T HE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, -515001

4. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALYANDURG, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT -515001

##PAGE2##

2

2026:APHC:35646

5. T HE THASILDAR, BOMMANAHAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. -515001

6. T HE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BOMMANAHAL POLICE STATION, BOMMANAHAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT,-515001

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents No.3 to 6 interfering with the land of the petitioners in Sy.No.224A for an extent of Ac.3.92 Cents at Uddehal Village, Bommanahal Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, without issuing any notice and without following due procedure trying to evict the petititoners from the schedule property is highly illegal and arbitray and violation of Article 14,21,300-A of Constitution of India and consequentially Direct the respondent No.3 to 6 not to interfere with the petitioners property in Sy.No.224A for an extent of Ac.3.92 Cents at Uddehal Village, Bommanahal Mandal, Ananthapuramu

District without following due process of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to 6 not to interfere with the land of petitioner in Sy.No.224A for an extent of Ac.3.92 Cents at Uddehal Village, Bommanahal Mandal, Ananthapuramu District pending disposal of the above

writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

##PAGE3##

3

2026:APHC:35646

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

The Court made the following:

##PAGE4##

4

2026:APHC:35646

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8581/2026

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

seeking the following relief:

“…..pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents Nos.3 to 6 in interfering with the land of the petitioners in Sy.No.224A for an extent of Ac.3.92 cents at Uddehal Village, Bommanahal Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, without issuing any notice and without following due procedure and trying to evict the petitioners from the schedule property is highly illegal and arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondent Nos.3 to 6 not to interfere with the petitioners property in Sy.No.224A for an extent of Ac.3.92 cents at Uddehal Village, Bommanahal Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, without following due process of law and to

pass…..”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant

Government Pleader appearing for Endowments.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of the property situated in Sy.No.224A, to an extent of Ac.3.92 cents at Uddeh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top