HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CHELICHAMA SAMBASIVA RAO – Appellant
Versus
CHELICHAMA HARIBABU – Respondent
CRP 87/2026
APHC010722372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3329]
AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 87/2026 Between:
1. CHELICHAMA SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O LATE CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O THELLABADU VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. CHELICHAMA HARIBABU, S/O SANKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O SVN COLONY, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT - 522006.
2. CHELICHAMA RAMABABU, , S/O SANKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O THELLABADU VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523211.
3. DESU PULLA RAO, S/O VENKATA SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O DAIVALARAVUR VILLAGE, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523212.
4. KANAPARTHY YOGAIAH, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O TELLABADU POST AND VILLAGE MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523211.
5. GATTENINI VENKATA SESHAIAH, S/OANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O MALLAVARAM VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523211.
6. ANNABATHINA SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O DODDAVARAM VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523211.
7. CHEEDARA PADMAVATHI, W/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. HOMEMAKER, R/O D.NO.5-173, CHIMAKURTHY VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523226. RESPONDENTS/
8. CHELICHAMA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. NOW RESIDENT AT CHICAGO, U.S.A. PERMANENT R/O THELLABADU VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523211.
9. NALLURI RAMA DEVI, , W/O KISHORE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSEMAKER, NOW R/O BHAGYANAGAR, BESIDE SRKT COLLEGE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523226.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to Being aggrieved by the Order and Decree, Dt. 10.09.2025 passed in C.M.A. No. 12 of 2021 on the file of the court of Learned III Additional District Judge, (FTC), Ongole, dismissing the appeal thereby confirming the Order and Decree dt. 15.10.2019 passed in I.A. No. 1259 of 2016 in O.S. No.291 of 2016 on the file of the court of Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.R.P.No.87 of 2026 This Court made the following
ORDER:
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order and decree dated 10.09.2025 passed in CMA No.12 of 2021 on the file of the Court of learned III Additional District Judge, (FTC), Ongole dismissing the appeal thereby confirming the order and decree dated 15.10.2019 passed in I.A.No.1259 of 2016 in O.S.No.291 of 2016 on the file of the Court of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.
2. The case of petitioner herein is that the father of the petitioner No.1 got purchased the plaint schedule mentioned property under two separate registered sale deeds dt.27.07.1977 and 22.10.1977 respectively from his vendor one Panda Venkata Raja Gopala Krishna Chowdary and his sons. Since then his father had been in possession and enjoyment of the same and also he had been raised dry crops i.e., tobacco, paddy, red gram etc., till his death. But he did not take steps for mutation and for issuance of pattadar passbook and title deed in respect of the petition schedule mentioned property in his name pursuant to his acquisition as required under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (For short “Act, 1971”) as there was no controversy from his vendor and therefore the names of the vendors remains in FLR and in other revenue records, the father of the petitioner died on 27.12.1990 as intestate leaving behind the Petitioners No.1 to 3/plaintiffs No.1 to 3 as his legal heirs. Therefore, the petitioners became joint owners of the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.