SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12599

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SMT ALETI PAVANI( SMT ARJI PAVANI) – Appellant
Versus
ARJI JAI KIRAN – Respondent
TRCMP 98/2026



##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:3V9G6K07R,J TR.C.M.P.NO.98 OF 2026

APHC010151422026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3397]

AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI

GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 98/2026

Between:

1. S MT ALETI PAVANI( SMT ARJI PAVANI), W/O ARJI JAI KIRAN, AGED 27 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO.9-9-108/2, MANGAPURAM COLONY, NEAR

KALABHARATHI, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...PETITIONER AND

1. A RJI JAI KIRAN, S/o Arji Gangathar Rao, Aged 30 years, Occ Business, R/o Plot Nos. 1035 and 1036, Kandrika, Payakapuram, Opp B.V. Subba Reddy School, NSB NTR

Commissionerate. ...RESPONDENT

Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to withdraw the FCOP.No.1388 of 2025 on the file of the Honble IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada and transfer the same to Honble V Additional District and Sessions-cum- Judge, Family

##PAGE2##

2026:APHC:3V9G6K07R,J TR.C.M.P.NO.98 OF 2026

Court at Visakhapatnam and to pass Prayer is amended as per C.O.dt 30/3/2026 in I.A.No.2/2026

IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to withdraw the FCOP.No.1388 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble II Additional District Judge Court at Vijayawada and transfer the same to Hon’ble V Additional District Judge Court at

Visakhapatnam and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the Paragraphs 8, 9, 10 and the Prayer in Tr.CMP.No.98 of 2026 in respect of the names of both the Courts i.e. IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada in which the FCOP.No.1388 of 2025 in the place of II Additional District Judge Court, Vijayawada and V Additional District and Sessions-cum- Judge, Family Court at Visakhapatnam in the place of V Additional District Judge Court at Visakhapatnam and

pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P VIJAYA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent:

1. GOUSIA PYARI The Court made the following:

##PAGE3##

2026:APHC:3V9G6K07R,J TR.C.M.P.NO.98 OF 2026

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 98/2026

ORDER:

The petitioner/wife herein filed the present petition under

Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the C.P.C.’), seeking to transfer the F.C.O.P.No.1388 of 2025, on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, to the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge - Cum - Family Court, Visakhapatnam, for trial

and disposal.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief is as follows:

i. The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent/husband, and their marriage was solemnized on 20.02.2022 at Ravindra Convention Hall, Prakashnagar, Vijayawada, as per Hindu Marriage customs and rituals. Thereafter, due to matrimonial disputes between the parties, the petitioner/wife has been residing separately in her parents’ house at Visakhapatnam and instituted two cases i.e., C.C.No.1977 of 2025 before the learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, and

##PAGE4##

2026:APHC:3V9G6K07R,J TR.C.M.P.NO.98 OF 2026

D.V.C.No.121 of 2025 before the learned IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, and they

are pending for adjudication.

ii. The petitioner further pleaded that the respondent/husband, to cause inconvenience to the petitioner, filed F.C.O.P.No.1388 of 2025, on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 r/w Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top