##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:38613

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI

Civil Revision Petition No.212 of 2026

Between:

Basireddy Rajeswara Reddy ...PETITIONER

AND

Kanchana Sreedevi ...RESPONDENT

ORDER PRONOUNCED ON: 02.04.2026

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY:

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers:

may be allowed to see the Judgments? YES/NO

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be:

Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? YES/NO

3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to:

see the fair copy of the Judgment? YES/NO

##PAGE2##

SRK, J

2 CRP No.212 of 2026 2026:APHC:38613

* THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY + Civil Revision Petition No.212 of 2026

% 02.04.2026

# Basireddy Rajeswara Reddy …Petitioner

Vs.

$ Kanchana Sreedevi … Respondent

!Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri M. Ravindra

^Counsel for the Respondent : Sri V. Nitesh

Gist :

>Head Note :

? Cases referred

1. (1988) 3 SCC 366

##PAGE3##

SRK, J

3 CRP No.212 of 2026 2026:APHC:38613

APHC010023592026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3327]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.212 OF 2026

Between:

Basireddy Rajeswara Reddy ...PETITIONER

AND

Kanchana Sreedevi ...RESPONDENT

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M RAVINDRA

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. V NITESH The Court made the following ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 06.01.2026 passed in IA No.1246 of 2025 in IA No.550 of 2025 in OS No.13 of 2025 by the learned II Additional

District Judge, Kadapa, at Proddatur.

2. The respondent herein/plaintiff filed O.S. No.13 of 2025 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Kadapa, at

Proddatur, seeking the following reliefs.

##PAGE4##

SRK, J

4 CRP No.212 of 2026 2026:APHC:38613

“a) direct the defendant in furtherance of agreement of sale, dated 24.04.2020 for receiving balance of sale consideration and for execution of regular registered sale deed in favour of plaintiff pertaining to suit schedule properties items Nos.1 to 4 under specific performance, on failure of the defendant, order to

execute the same under due process of law.

b) directing the defendant in consonance of registered sale deed stated above pertaining to suit schedule properties items Nos.1 to 4 to deliver its possession to the plaintiff free from all disputes and loans, on failure of the defendant, order to do the same under due process

of law.

c) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, assignees, successors and his men from in any way alienating the schedule properties items Nos.1 to 4 to third parties under any

circumstances.”

Pending the suit, the respondent/plaintiff filed IA No.550 of

2025, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, for grant of temporary injunction restraining the petitioner herein/defendant from in any way alienating the petition schedule property to third parties pending disposal of the suit. Along with the said application, the respondent also filed 3^rd party affidavits of Vaddi Pamuleti and Gosangi Venkata Subbaiah. It is the case of the petitioner that the said 3^rd party affidavits are without mentioning any Door numbers and Aadhar Cards and the signatures in the said two 3^rd party affidavits appear to be signed by one person causing rank forgery of alleged two 3^rd party affidavits. In

##PAGE5##

SRK, J

5 CRP No.212 of 2026 2026:APHC:38613

connection with that, the petitioner herein/defendant filed IA No.1246 of 2025 in IA No.550 of 2025 in OS No.13 of 2025 seeking to summon the deponents of said two 3^rd party affidavits in order to cross-examine them and to produce their Aadhar

Cards.

3. The respondent herein/plaintiff filed counter affidavit in the said petition, denying the petition averments and contending that the petitioner/defendant filed the present application with an intention to drag on the matter as much as possible, and

recording of evidence of third parties does not arise.

4. By the impug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document