SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12844

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
M/s. Sri Satyanarayana Granites and Industries – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 18614/2020



APHC010281882020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18614 OF 2020 Between:

M/s. Sri Satyanarayana Granites and Industries, Nagarajupalli, Martur Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Proprietor P Raghavaiah, S/o Koteshwarrao, aged 62 Years, R/o.Nagarajupalli, Martur Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Mines AND Geology Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

2. The Deputy Secretary to the Government, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Industries, Infrastructure Investment and Commerce (Mines-I) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

3. The Director of Mines and Geology, , 4th and 5th Floor, Sri Anjaneya Towers, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

4. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Vigilance, Old RIMS Building, Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in dismissing / passing of non speaking orders in the revision filed by the petitioner in Memo No.340/M.I(1)/2019-4, Dated 19.11.2019 inconsonance with the demand notice No.1280/Vg/2017, Dated 05.07.2018 issued by the 4th respondent without considering the case of the petitioner nor giving any opportunity of personnel hearing as well as without considering the evidence produced by her as illegal, arbitrary and also opposed to principles of natural justice as well as opposed to all cannons of justice, and also oppose to the verdict of this Honorable court in Novel Granites Vs State and Batch reported in 2008 CJ (AP) 547 consequentially stay of operation of the orders passed in Revision in Memo No.340/M.I(1)/2019-4, Dated 19.11.2019 inconsonance with the demand notice No.1280/Vg/2017, Dated 05.07.2018 issued by the 4th respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of operation of the orders passed in Revision in Memo No.340/M.I(1)/2019-4, Dated 19.11.2019 inconsonance with the demand notice No.1280/Vg/2017, Dated 05.07.2018 issued by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the writ petition by vacating the interim orders dated 13-10-2020 in IA.1/2020 in WP. 18614/2020 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following order:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18614 OF 2020

ORDER:

This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:

“to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in dismissing / passing of non speaking orders in the revision filed by the petitioner in Memo No.340/M.I(1)/2019-4, Dated 19.11.2019 inconsonance with the demand notice No.1280/Vg/2017, Dated 05.07.2018 issued by the 4th respondent without considering the case of the petitioner nor giving any opportunity of personnel hearing as well as without considering the evidence produced by her as illegal, arbitrary and also opposed to principles of natural justice as wel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top