2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13304
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K SREENIVASA REDDY
Gali Giridhar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 25367/2021
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:41290 APHC010414012021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3327]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25367/2021 Between:
1. GALI GIRIDHAR,, S/O PRABHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O 7-144/1, MODUKURU VILLAGE, T-SUNDURU
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI PS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in illegally taking possession of my vehicle bearing No AP 31 BD 2116, by model Tata Safari LX, arctic white colour as illegal arbitrary and sheer abuse of power besides being violative of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and principles of natural Justice, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to handover the possession of the vehicle and to pay compensation for the wear and tear and loss caused due to the
high handed action of the 2nd respondent and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KISHORE PARA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
##PAGE2##2 2026:APHC:41290
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25367 of 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of
respondents in illegally taking possession of petitioner’s car bearing No.AP 31 BD 2116, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct 2nd respondent to handover the possession of car and to pay compensation to the
petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the present
Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No order as to costs.
4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in
this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________
K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J.
Date: 01.04.2026 sj
##PAGE3##3 2026:APHC:41290
107
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Writ Petition No.25367 of 2021
Date: 01.04.2026
sj