HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR
SEIL ENERGY INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX – Respondent
WP 21936/2024
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:8550
APHC010424352024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3529]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION Nos.21930, 21933, 21936 & 21939 of 2024
WRIT PETITION NO: 21930/2024
Between:
1. M /S. SEIL ENERGY INDIA LIMITED, (FORMERLY M/S. SEMBCORP
ENERGY INDIA LIMITED), PYANAMPURAM/NELATUR VILLAGE,
MUTHUKUR MANDAL, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524344,
REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER - FINANCE, MR. AMITKUMAR
PATEL
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, GUNTUR
CGST COMMISSIONERATE, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, K.V.
THOTA, GUNTUR - 522 004
2. T HE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX GST
APPEALS, D. NO. 3-30-15, RING ROAD, GUNTUR, ANDHRA
PRADESH - 522 006
3. T HE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, CENTRAL G.S.T
DIVISION, NELLORE G.S.T.BHAVAN, D. NO. 24-7-205/2, PLOT NO.
121, 12TH ROAD, MAGUNTA LAYOUT, NELLORE - 524 003
4. T HE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, UDYOG BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110
##PAGE2##2
RRR,J &2 T0C26D:SA,JP HC:8550
W.P.No.21930 of 2024 & batch
001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one
in the nature WRIT OF MANDAMUS Setting aside the.impugned order i.e.,
ORDER-IN-APPEAL No GUN-GST-OOO-APP-017-2024-25 dated
30.05.2024 issued by the Respondent No. 2 a) Directing the Respondents to
grant the differential refund Rs. 7,18,96,234/- in respect of refund application
filed for the month of February 2023 in full with interest from the date of
application i.e., 19.04.2023 at the applicable rate and Pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to order provisional refund of 90% of the refund amount in
terms of sub-section (6) of section 54 of the COST Act read with Rule 91 of
the COST Rules and Circular No. 125/44/2019 dated 18.11.2019 and pass
such
IA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to grant leave to the respondent to file the counter affidavit
and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to grant leave for filing Rejoinder affidavit in the writ petition No.
21930/2024
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. LAKSHMI KUMARAN SRIDHARAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Y N VIVEKANANDA
##PAGE3##3
RRR,J &2 T0C26D:SA,JP HC:8550
W.P.No.21930 of 2024 & batch
The Court made the following Common Order:
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The petitioner, which is engaged in the business of power/electricity
generation and sale of such electricity, had been exporting electricity to
Bangladesh. This export was in two ways. Firstly, the petitioner was exporting
electricity to Bangladesh, by way of a direct agreement between the petitioner
and the Bangladesh Power Development Board. Secondly, it was being
supplied through M/s. Power Trading Corporation, which is entered into an
agreement with the Bangladesh Power Development Board.
2. The petitioner, after having exported electricity for some time, had
sought refund of the input tax credit, which is accumulated in its account, by
relying upon Section 16 of the I.G.S.T. Act, 2017 read with Section 54 of the
C.G.S.T. Act, 2017.
3. The procedure for appraising the refund applications made under
Section 54 of the C.G.S.T. Act, is set out under Rule 89 of the C.G.S.T. Rules.
Rule 89 provides for a formula to be applied for refund of the Inpu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.