SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14239

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
Veeranala Krishna Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The state of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 17209/2025



APHC010331232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3208]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 17209/2025 Between:

1. V EERANALA KRISHNA KUMARI,, W/O. LATE M SUBBARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. 42/604-1, N G O COLONY, CHINNACHOWK, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA-516002 ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI.

2. T HE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERALAANDE, ANDHRA PRADESH, STALIN CENTRAL MALL, 7TH FLOOR, M.G. ROAD, GOVERNOR PET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520002

3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

4. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA DIVISION, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

5. A CCOUNTS OFFICER, DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE KADAPA, YSR KADAPA ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents in not sanctioning and disbursing the family pension and other terminal benefits of the petitioner's late husband as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith sanction and disburse the family pension and all other terminal benefits, together with arrears and interest at an appropriate rate from the date of entitlement till the date of actual payment IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, to disposed the representations dated 03.02.2025 and to sanction Family Pension expeditiously, to issue orders in the writ petition and pass such other or orders are deemed fit and proper.

IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to amend the Main prayer as “Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents and the rejection of the petitioner’s claim for family pension vide endorsement dated 28.01.2020 issued by the 4 illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and consequently set aside the said endorsement dated 28.01.2020 and direct the respondents to forthwith sanction and disburse the family pension and other terminal benefits of the petitioner’s late husband, together with arrears and interest at an appropriate rate from the date of entitlement till the date of actual payment; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MUJTAHID HUSSAIN Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

2. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order i to declaring the inaction of the respondents in not sanctioning and disbursing the family pension and other terminal benefits of the petitioner's late husband as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith sanction and disburse the family pension and all other terminal benefits, together with arrears and interest at an appropriate rate from the date of entitlement till the date of actual payment….”

2. Heard M/s. Mujtahid Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner worked as Deputy T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top