SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14484

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
V ANANDABABU – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 7351/2023



APHC010144152023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3208]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 7351/2023 Between:

1. V ANANDABABU, S/O RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WORKING AS SANITARY MASTERY.

2. SMT.P.VARDHANAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

3. M.KOTESWARA RAO, S/O INNEYA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

4. M.NARAYANA, S/O SAIDULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

5. SMT.SK.SAIDABEE, W/O HUMMAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

6. K.HADDULU, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

7. CH.CHINNA NAGESWAR RAO, S/O BHADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT

48 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

8. K.VENKATESWARLU, S/O NAGULU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER.

9. SK.MASTHAN VALI, S/O LAL AHMED, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WORKING AS DRAIN CLEANER.

10. N .SARATH BABU, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, WORKING AS WATCHMAN.

11. K .YEDUKONDALU, S/O ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, WORKING AS BOREWELL MECHANIC-CUUM-

HELPER.

12. S MT.K.ROSAMMA, W/O KOTILINGAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, WORKING AS SWEEPER

13. C H.VENKATA RAO, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, WORKING AS DRAIN CLEANER. (ALL ARE WORKING IN PIDUGURALLA MUNICIPALITY, PALNADU DIST ...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MA AND UD DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST

2. T HE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GORANTLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. T HE PIDUGURALLA MUNICIPALITY, PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

...RESPONDENT(S):

The Court made the following ORDER:

1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the benefit of minimum of the time scale in the Revised Pay Scales issued from time to time along with arrears is illegal, arbitrary and also voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to extend the benefit of minimum of the time scale in the Revised Pay Scales issued from time to time along with arrears as per the law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in Jagjith Singh Case Reported in 2017 (1) SCC 148 and also in the case Sabashankar Dubey Vs. Divisional Forest Officer 2019 (12) SCC 297 and pass…”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been working as last grade employees on a daily wage basis for several years in the 3rd respondent Municipality and are continuing to work in the said capacity; however, they have not been extended the benefit of the minimum time scale of pay. Hence the Writ Petition is filed seeking extension of minimum time scale of pay as attached to the said post and placed reliance on law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Punjab vs. Jagjit Singh and Others, (2017) 1 SCC 148

4. Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders.

5. Considering the submissions, without going into the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for extending payment of minimum time scale in terms of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Punjab vs. Jagjit Singh and Others within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.

________________________

JUSTICE D RAMESH

11.02.2026 klk

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 7351/2023

11.02.2026 klk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top