SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14492

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
BHAGAVAN SRI KRISHNA AKHILA BHARATHA NITYA ANNADANA SEVA SAMASTHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 4152/2026



APHC010074472026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4152/2026 Between:

1. B HAGAVAN SRI KRISHNA AKHILA BHARATHA NITYA ANNADANA SEVA SAMASTHA, (REGD. NO. 407/2002), KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP BY ITS PRESIDENT GORLA SATYANARAYANA, S/O G. RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC PRESIDENT OF BHAGAVAN SRI KRISHNA AKHILA BHARATHA NITYA ANNADANA SEVA SAMASTHA, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH, R/O H. NO. 28-16-48/A3, NUNEPALLI, NANDYALA TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518001.

2. G ORLA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O G. RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC PRESIDENT OF BHAGAVAN SRI KRISHNA AKHILA BHARATHA NITYA ANNADANA SEVA SAMASTHA, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH, R/O H. NO. 28-16-48/A3, NUNEPALLI, NANDYALA TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518001.

3. D ONDAPATI SRINIVASULU,, S/O VENKATESHWARLU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER OF DT PETITIONER, R/O H. NO. 4-35-563/12/A, FLAT. NO. 401, SRI SAI AVENUE, RAMA RAO NAGAR COLONY, VTC, KUKATPALLY OF MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT-500029

4. N ARLIGALLA VENU GOPAL,, S/O PANDURANGA RAO,AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER OF LST PETITIONER, R/O H. NO. 4-79, BHUDDHANAGAR COLONY, PEERZADIGUDA,BODUPPAL,GHATKESARMANDAL, MEDCHAL MALKAJGIRIDISTRICT-500029

5. M EKALA RAJENDHAR YADAV,, S/O ESHWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT

69 YEARS, OCC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER OF 1ST PETITIONER, R/O H. NO. 13-2-601-136, CID COLONY, RAHEEMPURA, HYDERABAD.

6. M AILIKA BALA MALLESH,, S/O MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC VIEE PRESIDENT OF 1ST PETITIONER, R/O H. NO. 8-1-209, PRAGATHI COLONY, OPP RAGHAVENDRA HOSPITAL, MAILDEVARAPALLI, PALLECHERU, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT-

500029 ...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELLAGAPUDI, GUNTUR, AMRAVATHI-522237

2. T HE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-52001

3. T HE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518001.

4. S RI BHRAMARAMBIKA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT. REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. -518001.

5. T HE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRISAILAM POLICE STATION, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT -518001.

6. P INNIKA LAKSHMI PRASAD YADAV, S/O LATE GANGAIAH, AGED

55 YEARS, R/O KHAPURAM BESIDE HANURNAN TEMPLE, MARKAPURAM TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-518001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to ISSUE an order or orders or direction or an appropriate writ more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the 4th respondent Devasthanam in interfering with the operations of a private Society, operating under the name and style of Bhagavan Sri Krishna Akhila Bharatha Nitya Annadana Seva Samastha, vide Regd. No. 407 of 2002 situated at srisailam, Nandayal District as illegal arbitrary, without any jurisdiction, in contrary to the law and pass such other order or orders as and Consequently, direct the Respondents more particularly the respondent Nos 2 to 4 and 6 not to interfere in any manner whatsoever with the operations of a private Society, operating under the name and style of Bhagavan Sri Krishna Akhila Bharatha Nitya Annadana Seva Samastha, vide Regd. No. 407 of 2002 situated at srisailam, Nandayal District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents more particularly the 4th respondent Devasthanam not to interfere in any manner whatso ever with the operations of 1st Petitioner Society including not to take any steps in the matter of conducting the proposed m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top