APHC010749972013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33824/2013 Between:

1. K .V.GADDAYYA S/O RAMANNA,, R/O 3RD WARD RAYALAM BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DIST, ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD

2. T HE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD

3. T HE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, D.N.R. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION BHIMAVARAM-2,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not reinstating the petitioner in to service as per the findings of the enquiry report dt. 18.2.2013 submitted along with RJD report dt. 8.5.2013 as illegal and arbitrary and consequentially direct the 2nd respondent to take further steps to direct the 3rd respondent to re-instate the petitioner into service as per the enquiry report dt. 18.2.2013 submitted through the RJD dt.

8.5.2013 with all consequential benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 42099 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to re-instate the petitioner into service pursuant to the RJD Enquiry Report dt.8.5.2013 pending disposal of the main writ petition

1. M L ALI

1. GP FOR EDUCATION

2. K V L NARASIMHA RAO

ORDER:

1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today.

2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation. In view of the same, it is further submitted that the question of considering the petitioner’s case for reinstatement or re-engagement does not arise at this stage and, therefore, cannot be considered.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court is of the considered view that no further adjudication survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________

288 WRIT PETITION NO: 33824 of 2013