SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14765

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUMATHI JAGADAM
Rayudu Sirisha – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P – Respondent


APHC010820752018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3459]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39639/2018 Between:

1. R AYUDU SIRISHA, D/O NAGESWARA RAO ,AGED 23YRS, 3-

59,INDIRAMMA COLONY,ATLAPADU,W.G.DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. S TATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

2. T HE TAHSILDAR, PITHAPURAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

3. T HE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, B.C.CORPORAION,KAKINADA ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in encroaching on the petitioners land of 445sq.yrds situated in S.no. 486/1 adjoining the house with D.no 13-2-100 in Pithapuram as illegal,arbitrary ,violative of the petitioners constitutional rights including art 21 and 300A etc and with a consequential direction not to disturb petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment and pass IA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top