HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUMATHI JAGADAM
Rayudu Sirisha – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P – Respondent
APHC010820752018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3459]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 39639/2018 Between:
1. R AYUDU SIRISHA, D/O NAGESWARA RAO ,AGED 23YRS, 3-
59,INDIRAMMA COLONY,ATLAPADU,W.G.DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND
1. S TATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. T HE TAHSILDAR, PITHAPURAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. T HE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, B.C.CORPORAION,KAKINADA ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in encroaching on the petitioners land of 445sq.yrds situated in S.no. 486/1 adjoining the house with D.no 13-2-100 in Pithapuram as illegal,arbitrary ,violative of the petitioners constitutional rights including art 21 and 300A etc and with a consequential direction not to disturb petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment and pass IA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.