APHC010409812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3329]

AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2234/2025 Between:

1. M ERUVA KARTHK, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT

35 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE DOCTOR, R/O. DARSI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. G ARNEPUDI JOHN KRUPA RAO, S/O. JOHN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. PASUPUGALLU VILLAGE MUNDLAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

2. G ARNEPUDI SUDHAKAR, S/O. JOHN KRUPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. EDURUVARI BAZAAR, DARSI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

3. G ARNEPUDI PRASANNA, S/O. JOHN KRUPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. PASUPUGALLU VILLAGE, MUNDLAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

4. S OMU CHOWDI REDDY, S/O. RAMSWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC COMPUTER BUSINESS, R/O. PODILI ROAD, DARSI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. .

5. M ALLELA PRABHAKAR RAO, S/O. JOHN, AGED ABOUT

65 YEARS, OCC RTC CONDUCTOR, R/O. KSR VENTURE, KURICHEDU RAOD, DARSI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to allow the Civil Revision petition by setting aside the order dt. 22-07-2025 in C.M.A. No. 2 of 2025 on the file of the Honble Senior Civil Judge Court, Darsi whereunder dismissed the CMA, by confirming the order dt. 13-03-2025 in I.A. No. 1489 of 2023 in O.S. No. 291 of 2023 on the file of the Honble Civil Judge (Junior Division)

whereunder dismissed the injunction petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. NAGA RAJU KOLLATI

2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.R.P.No.2234 of 2025 This Court made the following

ORDER

Brief facts of the case Plaintiff filed suit for grant of permanent injunction against the respondents herein restraining them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. Plaintiff filed application for ad-interim injunction and initially granted the ad-interim injunction. Thereafter after enquiry the application was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same the CMA was filed and the same was dismissed by confirming the order and decree passed in IA No.1489/2023 in O.S.No.291/2023, dated 13.03.2025. The schedule property of the petitioner originally purchased by the parents of the petitioner under unregistered sale deeds from the respective original owners of the property in the year 2000. In the year 2017 on request of the parents of the petitioner herein vendors came forward and executed the sale deeds which were presented for registration before the registering authority, accordingly deeds were registered with pending registration but not released so far. There is no dispute with regard to identification and rights of original owners. Those documents were rejected by the Sub-Registrar by giving pending registration number on the ground that this property was enlisted within the prohibitory property list because long back this land was sought to be acquired by the Government for establishing APSRTC Depot. Writ Petitions have been filed wherein the land acquisition notification was set aside by this Hon’ble Court and later APSRTC had acquired other land and got constructed the Depot somewhere else and APSRTC filed Writ Appeals which are pending before this Hon’ble Court. But in the year 2018 without knowing that fact the petitioner filed a writ petition before this Hon’ble Court since his documents were rejected by the registering authority seeking a direction to the concerned authorities to take necessary action for deleting the subject property from the list of prohibitory property list. That writ petition was disposed directing the District Collector to take necessary action. In the meanwhile the Trial Court t