HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
S. Gopala Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 10035/2016
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:7647
1
APHC010059842016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10035 OF 2016
Between:
1. S. Gopala Rao, S/o.S.Subba Rao, Aged 26 years, R/o.D.No.17-76,
Damerla Vari Street, (via) Vijayawada, Kondapalli, Krishna District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Irrigation (Projects Wing) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Andhra Pradesh Power Generation, Corporation, Rep. by its
Chairman & Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad.
3. The District Collector, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
4. The Chief Engineer, Dr.Narla Tatarao Thermal Power Station (VTPS),
Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in
the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court
may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in
the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 1st
Respondent in issuing impugned G.O.Ms. No. 98, dated 15-04-1986
conferring benefit of employment only to the displaced person, son,
daughter and spouse, thereby denying grandson or other members of the
##PAGE2##2026:APHC:7647
2
family, who are dependants on the land so acquired for the purpose of
public projects and consequential action of the Respondents 2 to 4 in
denying employment to the petitioner under Land Looser Category only
on the ground that petitioner is grandson as highly illegal, arbitrary,
violative of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India, and to pass such
order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit just and proper in the
circumstances of this case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 12677 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the petitioner for
employment under Land Looser Category in any posts of Security Guard /
Fireman any other suitable post, as vacancies are existing under the 4th
Respondent without rejecting the claim of the petitioner only on the
ground that the petitioner is grandson pending disposal of the above writ
petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in
the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: G V SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondents: Nagaraju Naguru Standing Counsel
For APGENCO
Counsel for the Respondents:K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC
For APGENCO
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP)
The Court made the following order:
##PAGE3##2026:APHC:7647
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.10035 OF 2016
ORDER:
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer:
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one
in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned
action of the 1st Respondent in issuing impugned G.O.Ms.
No. 98, dated 15-04-1986 conferring benefit of employment
only to the displaced person, son, daughter and spouse,
thereby denying grandson or other members of the family,
who are dependants on the land so acquired for the
purpose of public projects and consequential action of the
Respondents 2 to 4 in denying employment to the petitioner
under Land Looser Category only on the ground that
petitioner is grandson as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of
Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India, and to pass …..”
2. Heard Sri K.Bharat Kumar, learned counsel representing
Sri G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Standing Counsel for APGENCO appearing for the respondents.
3. When the matter is called for hearing, learned counsel for the
petitioner submitted that though they raised several assertions in the
writ petition, as per the instructions of hi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.