SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16469

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
SINGAVARAM NAGAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 8729/2026



* THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.8729 OF 2026 % 06.04.2026 # Singavaram Nagamma, W/o.Subhan Singh, aged about 59 years, Occ: House wife, R/o.D.No.13/978-3, Saravayapalle Road, Mydukur Town & Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District and others ……Petitioner And:

$ The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District - 522238 and other ….Respondent.

!Counsel for the petitioners : Mr.D.Vigneshwar Reddy ^Counsel for the respondents : GP FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH Gist:

>Head Note:

? Cases referred:

1. W.P.(C).No.16793 of 2025 dated 31.12.2025

2. 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 739

3. 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 880 4. WA/1538/2024 Madras HC

5. W.P(C) No.24656 of 2024 Orissa HC HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI * * * *

WRIT PETITION No.8729 OF 2026 DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 06.04.2026 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Your Lordships wish to see the fair Yes/No copy of the Judgment?

_________________________________

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8729/2026

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:-

“to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, invoking the parens patriae jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court, appoint petitioner No.3 as the legal guardian of my father, Sri Singavaram Subhan Singh, who is presently in a vegetative/comatose state, for the limited purpose of operating and withdrawing amounts from his Axis Bank Account bearing No. 913010036494989, for meeting his medical expenses, and to pass such other order or orders.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband of petitioner No.1 and father of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 i.e., Mr.Singavaram Subhan Singh is aged about 65 years, is diagnosed with CVA-left CG Hematoma, Status Post Left FTP Decompressive Craniectomy and underwent a surgery at Care Hospital HI-Tech city. After completion of surgery his medical condition has not improved and he continued to remain in vegetative state, requiring tracheostomy tube for breathing and Ryle tube for feeding. For medical treatment as was done till date and for further continuation of medical treatment, since he has been in vegetative state, requires so much of funds. Further, Mr.Singavaram Subhan Singh, who is in vegetative state, vested with movable and immovable properties stands in his name and there is credit/deposit amount of Rs.14,38,015/- in his bank account, which is lying with respondent No.2. He further submits that to meet all medical expenses and day to day expenses is become so difficult for the petitioners without touching the funds lying at bank account of their father. Therefore, to withdraw the funds from his account, among the petitioners one of them has to be declared as guardian to operate the bank account lying with the respondent No.2 and to deal with the properties of Mr.Singavaram Subhan Singh. He further submits that there is no other known procedure can be adopted except invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Admittedly there is no other procedure either under the civil law remedies or under any special law remedies were provided under any enactment. For which, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment rendered by the High Court of Delhi in Professor Alka Acharya vs. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.,1

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that in view of the judgment rendered by the High Court of Delhi as stated supra, am

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top