##PAGE1##

RC,J CRP No.11442 o0f2 260:A25P HC:15176

1

APHC010201792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3332]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1144/2025 Between:

1. DESU SATYANARAYANA, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 62 YEARS

2. DESU VENKATA SESHAGIRI RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED

60 YEARS.

3. DESU VARA PRAKASA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 58 YEARS

4. DESU MALLIKARJUNA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 51 YEARS.

5. DESU KASIVISWANADHAM,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 49 YEARS

6. DESU SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 47 YEARS.

7. DESU SUBRAHAMANYAM,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 45 YEARS, (BOTH ARE RESIDING AT ISWARYA NAGAR, ONGOLE

TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT)

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. NARRA PAPULAMMA, W/O. SUBBARAO, BEING NEXT FRIEND, NARRA NAGESWARARAO S/O. SUBBARAO, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O.

ADDANKI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

RC,J CRP No.11442 o0f2 260:2A5P HC:15176

2

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

4. THE THASILDAR, ADANKI,PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the C.R.P. by setting aside the Order, dated 10-03-2025 in I.A No.962 /2024 in O.S.No.47/2015 on the file of Civil Judge (Senior

Division), Addanki, Prakasam District.

IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S No. 47/2015 on the file of the court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Addanki, Prakasam District, Andhra

Pradesh pending disposal of the above revision petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to extend the stay granted on 04-09-2025 in I.A No. 1/2025 in

CRP No. 1144/2025 and extended on 20-12-2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM

RC,J CRP No.11442 o0f2 260:2A5P HC:15176

3

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and

correctness of the order dated 10.03.2025 passed in I.A.No.962 of 2024 in

O.S.No.47 of 2015 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Addanki. 2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the

defendants in O.S.No.47 of 2015.

3. The facts that led to filing of this Civil Revision Petition, in brief, are

that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed the suit vide O.S.No.47 of 2015 for declaration of their right over Plot-A1, mandatory injunction and mesne profits from defendant no.1. In the said suit the respondent no.1/defendant no.1, represented by her son filed petition vide I.A.No.962 of 2024 under Order- XXXII, Rule-15 of Code of Civil Procedure to appoint son of the defendant no.1 as guardian for adducing evidence. The petitioners resisted the claim made in the petition by filing counter. The learned trial Judge, upon hearing the counsel for the parties and upon considering the material available on record, allowed the petition. The said order has been challenged in this Civil

Revision Petition.

4. Heard Sri Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti, learned counsel for the

petitioners and Sri Ramachandra Rao Gurram, learned counsel for respondent no.1. The respondent nos.2 to 4 despite served with notice neither appeared

nor put up their appearance through counsel.

RC,J CRP No.11442 o0f2 260:2A5P HC:15176

4

5. Sri Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti, learned counsel for petitioners, while

reiterating the contents of the counter filed before the trial Court and grounds of Civil Revision Petition would contend that defendant no.1 fil