SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16973

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
SARADA METALS AND ALLOYS LTD – Appellant
Versus
AP ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION – Respondent


APHC010465652024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench [3483]

AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 24693 of 2024 Sarada Metals and Alloys Ltd. ...Petitioner Vs.

A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission ...Respondent **********

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned Senior Counsel appearing vice Mr. Sai Sanjay Suraneni Advocate for Respondent: Mr. V. R. N. Prashanth CORAM : T HE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 2 2nd April, 2026.

Per DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ:

The petitioner in the present Writ Petition challenges inter alia the validity and vires of Regulation 3.3 of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Renewable Power Purchase Obligation (Compliance by purchase of Renewable Energy/Renewable Energy Certificates) Regulations, 2017 and 2022, issued by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short, “the APERC”).

2. With a view to understand in the correct perspective the background in which the present controversy arises, it is necessary to give in brief the material facts:

The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing and export of manganese – based Ferro Alloys which is a primary element of steel m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top