SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17285

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Battu Devanand, J
JONNALA SUBBA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 8775/2026|IA NO: 1 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Somisetty Ganesh Babu
For the Respondents:

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous following the submission of the petitioner's counsel that subsequent developments rendered the matter redundant for further adjudication.

Headnote:(Procedural Law) - Dismissal of Petition - When subsequent developments render the prayer redundant, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Issues: Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication in light of subsequent developments.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in refusing to release the pledged gold ornaments (513.100 grams) under Gold Loan Account No. 0151671100095169 upon payment of the total outstanding dues as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to Law and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles and 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents to accept the total outstanding amount of 27,43,555/- (with interest up to date of payment) and simultaneously release/return the pledged gold ornaments to the Petitioner and Pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondents from proceeding with the public auction/private sale of the gold ornaments scheduled for 30.03.2026 or any subsequent date, pending disposal of this Writ Petition and pass

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top