The court closed the writ petition while directing that the interim order granting continuation of service to the petitioners shall remain applicable to all of them.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Directions(s) more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent University in discontinuing the services of Petitioners from 2014-15 academic year without any basis and reason despite availability of work load, after taking the services from the Petitioners for several years while continuing several others who are similarly placed and further hold the said action as illegal, arbitrary and an action taken for extraneous reasons and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondent University to continue the Petitioners to the post of Academic consultants / teaching assistants in the respective departments till they are regularized and/or regular selections were taken up and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 40787 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to continue the Petitioners in the post of Teaching Assistants/Academic consultants in the Respondent University with the same terms and conditions pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass such order or further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the

IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 91 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order Dated: 30.10.2014 in W.P.M.P.No: 40787 of 2014 in WP No: 32626 of 2014 and dismiss the writ petition with costs

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner,,,No.3 to withdraw the Writ Petition and delete his name from the array of the petitioners in WP.No.32626 of 2014 as well as Interlocutory Applications and pass such other

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. J SUDHEER

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. TENEPALLI NIRANJAN (SC FOR Y V UNIVERWSITY))

2. G V S KISHORE KUMAR

The Court made the following:

Order:-

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are continued in service in terms of the interim orders passed by this Court on 30.10.2014. It is also submitted that no further recruitment has been undertaken by the respondents.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on 10.03.2026, I.A. No. 1 of 2022 was allowed by this Court permitting the 3rd petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. It is submitted that the 3rd petitioner intended to withdraw the contempt case and that, on account of miscommunication, the said I.A. was filed.

Be that as it may, this writ petition is closed in terms of the interim order granted earlier, and the interim order shall be applicable to all the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.