SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17339

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3459]


APHC010038092019


WRIT PETITION NO: 1733/2019


Between:

1. MANDU SUVARTHA, W/O. MANDU VENKATARATNAM HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-92, ARULLA VILLAGE, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

2. SIRRA PADMA, W/O. DAVID RAJU, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-107/3, NEAR GAYATRI TEMPLE, WEAKERS COLONY, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)


AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU.

4. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI.

...RESPONDENT(S):


1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO

1. GP FOR REVENUE


THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM


MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX


JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM


Date:16.03.2026


DSH

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly ore in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from his land of an extent of Ac.0-75 cents in Sy.No.294/12 of Arulla Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal West Godavari District without following due process of law is illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violative of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, Board Standing Orders, Revenue Laws and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's land without following due process of law.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from his land of extent of Ac.0-75 cents in Sy.No.294/12 of Arulla Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District without following due process of law pending disposal of the main writ petition.

The Court made the following

ORDER:

On 18.10.2019, this Court, after hearing the matter at length, vacated the interim order holding that the subject land is in survey number 294/22 and not in 294/12 of Arulla Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District and further 1) Talla Pragada Bhaskararao, 2) Kokkirala Peda Bulliyya and 3) Katta Parvatesam are in possession of the land in Survey No.294/12.

2. When the matter was called on 02.03.2026, learned counsel for the petitioners has requested for time. Today, when the matter was called, there was no representation.

3. Since the survey number mentioned in the Writ Petition is 294/12, which is incorrect based on the previous findings, and it appears that the petitioners are not the owners of the said land, coupled with the fact that this Court has already vacated the interim order, granter earlier, on 18.10.2019, this Court feels that there is no necessity for further adjudication in this matter and, accordingly, the Writ Petition is to be dismissed.

4. Accordingly, with the above observation, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top