SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Nyapathy Vijay, J
SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESWARA CHAARVI LIONS CRICKET ACADEMY – Appellant
Versus
SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 32123/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Chamarthy Leela Srinnivasa Varma
For the Respondents: Ramesh Babu Talluri

The Court directed the university authorities to consider the cricket academy's request to use the playground for coaching in accordance with the State Government's Sports Policy and the Government Memo allowing public access between 4:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - Use of Government Educational Institution Premises - Government Memo - Playgrounds of Government institutions can be utilized by the general public between 4:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. in accordance with the Sports Policy of the State Government. (Para 4, 7)

(B) Principles of Natural Justice - Restraining activities - Where infrastructure exists for mutual benefit, authorities should consider permission for usage in terms of existing government guidelines. (Para 7, 8)

Issues: Whether the Petitioner-Society is entitled to utilize the respondent's playground for cricket coaching in accordance with the Government Memo dated 29.01.2025.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to allow the use of a university playground for cricket coaching. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents oppose usage based on lack of permission and government memo restricting public access to 4am-7am. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court observes that existing infrastructure can be used for mutual benefit under the state sports policy. (Para 6 , 7)
4. direction to authorities to consider permission for playground usage within four weeks. (Para 8)

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the highhanded action of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and their authorities in restraining the petitioner society activities, trying to not allow the students/players to play/coaching at 2nd respondents playground is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Govt. Memo No.2700647/MC/2025, dated 29.01.2025 and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and their authorities to allow the petitioner and their students/players to play/coaching at 2nd respondents playground and follow due process of law and pass such other orders.

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and their authorities to allow the petitioner and their students/players to play/coaching at 2nd respondent’s playground, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other orders.

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to the rejoinder affidavit to be the part of the record, and condone the delay to file the reply affidavit in WP.No.32123 of 2025 if any and pass such other orders.

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in restraining the Petitioner-Society in using the playground for the purpose of providing coaching to the students/aspiring cricket players and to declare the same as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The facts in brief are as follows;

The Petitioner is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 2001 with an intention to provide cricket training to students/aspirants. It is stated that pursuant to the representation of the Petitioner in the year 2023, Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have permitted the Petitioner to utilize their ground for the purpose of giving cricket training/coaching to the students before school hours in the morning and after school hours in the evening. While so, in August, 2025, the authorities working under Respondent No.2 orally instructed the Petitioner to stop utilizing the cricket ground. Though the Petitioner-Society submitted representations thereafter, the same were not being considered. Hence, the Writ Petition is filed.

3. In the Counter-Affidavit filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2, it is stated that no permission was granted to the Petitioner-Society to conduct any coaching activity in the University premises at any point of time. Despite the absence of any permission, the Petitioner-Society had been utilizing the premises for commercial coaching activities and collecting substantial fees from the participants. A reference was also made to the Government Memo No.2700647/MC/2025, dated 29.01.2025, wherein it is stated that the premises of Government Educational Institutions would be utilized only for academic activities relating to the institutions concerned and for bona fide Government activities.

4. It is also mentioned in the Government Memo that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top