Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Subba Reddy Satti, J
Kandi Tata Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of parties and the nature of the writ petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of contentions regarding building plan legality and local authority interference. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court intervention requiring adherence to due process of law. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actions of the respondents 3 to 5 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house property bearing Assessment No.817, situated in Sy.Nos. 54/12 and 54/13 of Akkivaram village, Denkada Mandal, Vizianagaram District at the behest of the 6th respondent against whom there is an injunction order in IA.No.318 of 2021 in O.S.No.680 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, dt.1.02.2022, as arbitrary, illegal, high handed and violative of the Principles of Natural Justice and Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Sect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
