SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17804

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y Lakshmana Rao, J
Lakkana Basaveswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 9899/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B Paramesewara Rao
For the Respondents: GP for Home, GP for Medical Health FW

The court determined that since the FIR was registered in Telangana, the petitioner must seek legal remedies before the High Court of Telangana, despite the autopsy being performed in Andhra Pradesh.

Headnote:(A) Jurisdiction - Writ Petition - Territorial Jurisdiction - Where the FIR is registered in one state (Telangana) and the autopsy is conducted in another (Andhra Pradesh), the appropriate forum for seeking remedies regarding the investigation is the High Court of the state where the FIR was registered. (Para 3, 4)

Issues: Whether the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has the jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a fresh investigation when the FIR was registered in the state of Telangana.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeking mandamus for fresh investigation and postmortem. (Para 1 , 2)
2. determination of jurisdiction based on fir registration location. (Para 3)
3. direction to seek remedy in the appropriate jurisdictional high court. (Para 4 , 5)

The Court made the following:

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondents2 and 3 in not conducting proper investigation into the death of the petitioners son and in conducting a sham postmortem as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent 2 and 3 to conduct a fresh fair and independent enquiry by a competent authority and to take appropriate criminal and departmental action against all persons who are responsible….”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader.

3. As seen from the record, the FIR was registered at Kusumanchi in Khammam District as Crime No. 125 of 2024 on 24.06.2024. The deceased, by name LakkanaBharath Sai, died in Guntur. Therefore, the Medical Officer of Government General Hospital, Guntur, conducted autopsy on the cadaver of LakkanaBharath Sai. It appears that the autopsy proceedings were transferred to Kusumanchi Police Station on the point of jurisdiction.

4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the High Court of Telangana in accordance with law.

5. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top