SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18170

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI NATH TILHARI
Kumari Kundrapu Priyanka – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Bandaru Varalakshmi – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

The petitioners are the claim petitioners, who have filed an un-numbered claim petition under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short ‘CPC’), at the stage of registration (G.R.No.360 of 2026) in E.P.No.57 of 2019 in O.S.No.302 of 2017, on the file of the Court of the X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anakapalli.

2. This C.R.P under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed raising the grievance that the said claim petition filed by the claim petitioners under Order XXI Rule 58 C.P.C. was returned at the numbering stage by the said Court for the third time, raising different objections to the registration on all the occasions the same was presented and represented.

3. The prayer has been made to set aside the orders of return of the claim petition at the stage of numbering and to direct the Court of the X Additional District Judge, Anakapalli to register the claim petition filed in G.R.No.360 of 2026 in the aforesaid case.

4. The respondents 1 and 2 herein are the plaintiffs/decree holders. They hold the decree in a suit for recovery of amount against the defendants/judgment debtors, passed in O.S.No.302 of 2017 by the Court o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top