2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18187
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR
M/s VASAVI RICE TRADERS – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX – Respondent
WP 3476/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:18217
APHC010042842026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3529]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 3476/2026
Between:
1. M /S VASAVI RICE TRADERS, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING
PARTNER - SRI JAGANMOHAN RAO KOLLURU, DOOR NO.4-36,
PEDDAPULIVARRU, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. PIN - 522257
...PETITIONER
AND
1. D EPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, BAPATLA
CIRCLE, BAPATLA, D.NO-11-2-18,OPPOSITE TO RAILWAY
STATION, SIVALAYAM STREET, BAPATLA, ANDHRA PRADESH-
PIN 522101
2. S TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF A.P. REVENUE (CT)
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS
VELAGAPUDI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR (DISTRICT), AP,
PIN -522 503
3. A SSISATANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, D. NO 11-2-
18,OPPOSITE TO RAILWAY STATION, SIVALAYAM STREET,
BAPATLA, ANDHRA PRADESH-522101
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:18217
nature of Writ of Mandamus, setting aside the impugned arrear urgent Notice
dated 07-08-2025 and Notice of attachment and sale of immovable properties
in Form GST DRC-16 dated 28-11-2025, the claimed common show-cause
Notice and its separate summaries and the common adjudication
proceedings and separate claimed adjudication orders and their summaries
issued under Section 74 of the GST Acts by the Respondent No1 and to
pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to stay the collection of the disputed tax of Rs.12,57,987, the
disputed penalty of Rs.12,57,987, the disputed interest of Rs.340 and the
disputed late fees of Rs.6,35,178 (Total amount of Rs.31,51,493) and to
pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:18217
The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Heard Sri J.N. Venkata Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing
for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is a registered Company, which has been served
with an order of assessment, dated 18.10.2024, passed by the 1st respondent.
This order of assessment covers the period from 2017-2018 to 2022-2023.
3. The petitioner, after having raised various grounds of challenge,
has pressed the ground that, a single order of assessment, issued for more
than one financial year, would be violative of the provisions of Sections 73 &
74 of the GST Act, 2017 and consequently, set aside the impugned order of
assessment.
4. A Division Bench of this Court, in W.P.Nos.11028 of 2025 &
batch, after considering the said question, had held that, a single show-cause
notice or a single composite assessment order, cannot be passed, in relation
to more than one tax period of either a month if the assessment is taken up
before the due date for filing of the annual return or for more than one year if
the due date for filing of annual return has been reached.
5. The petitioner has raised various grounds of challenge. However,
the petitioner is pressing the primary ground of the order of assessment being
a composite order of assessment. In that view of the matter, the present Writ
##PAGE4##4
2026:APHC:18217
Petition is being disposed of, on this ground of challenge, leaving open the
other grounds of challenge.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, setting aside the
impugned order of assessment, dated 18.10.2024 and remand back to the
respondents, leaving it open to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings,
for each assessment year separately, subj