HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
PILLA TAMMAYYA PATRUDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP. MUNICIPAL ADMN. & 3 OTHERS – Respondent
APHC010813752015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6701/2015 Between:
Pilla Tammayya Patrudu ...PETITIONER AND State Of Ap Municipal Admn 3 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOMMULA VENKATA RATNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
3. J DILEEP KUMAR
4. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD The Court made the following:
ORDER
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to change the alignment of the proposed road widening of 100-0” Feet wide master plan road from Nh-16 (Chandrampalem) to Bakkanapalem Village and in rejecting our Building Application by way of Endorsement dated 24.01.2015, vide B.A.No.10156/2015/ACP-1, as illegal, arbitrary, high handed without jurisdiction and voilative of Article 14, 21
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.