SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 23010

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
PILLA TAMMAYYA PATRUDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP. MUNICIPAL ADMN. & 3 OTHERS – Respondent


APHC010813752015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6701/2015 Between:

Pilla Tammayya Patrudu ...PETITIONER AND State Of Ap Municipal Admn 3 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KOMMULA VENKATA RATNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)

2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)

3. J DILEEP KUMAR

4. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD The Court made the following:

ORDER

The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to grant an order, direction or writ, more so in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to change the alignment of the proposed road widening of 100-0” Feet wide master plan road from Nh-16 (Chandrampalem) to Bakkanapalem Village and in rejecting our Building Application by way of Endorsement dated 24.01.2015, vide B.A.No.10156/2015/ACP-1, as illegal, arbitrary, high handed without jurisdiction and voilative of Article 14, 21

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top