SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 23188

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Dwaram Gabriel Jedidiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 30113/2024



APHC010574542024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331]

FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 30113/2024 Between:

1. D WARAM GABRIEL JEDIDIAH,, S/O (LATE) B MERCY MANJULA VANI AGED AROUND 29 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 43/127/1 A, E.C.M. COMPUND, KURNOOL (URBAN) MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI

2. T HE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH

3. T HE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA DISTRICT

4. T HE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT

5. T HE DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT

6. T HE E C M AIDED HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, KURNOOL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD MASTER ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 3 to 5 herein in appointing the Petitioner as Junior Assistant or any other equivalent post against the vacancies in the Respondent No.6 school under compassionate grounds, in terms of the G.O.Ms.No.11, School Education (PS) Department, dated 02.02.2018 as sheer arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the object of the Scheme of Compassionate appointment to the dependents of the deceased employees of the Recognized Aided Institutions besides being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to 6 herein to appoint Petitioner as Junior Assistant or any other equivalent post in Respondent No.6 school expeditiously within the stipulated time period as this Honble Court may fix in accordance with the law and/or pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to 6 herein to consider, process and dispose the Petitioner’s application dated 07.09.2020 in accordance with the law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SHAIK MD UMAR ABDULLAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following:

:: ORDER ::

Heard Sri K. Koutilya, learned counsel, representing Sri Sk. Md. Umar Abdulah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education appearing for respondents 1 to 5.

2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents Nos.3 to 5 in not appointing the petitioner as Junior Assistant or in any other equivalent post in the respondent No.6-School on compassionate grounds in terms of G.O.Ms.No.11, School Education (PS) Department, dated

02.02.2018 as illegal and arbitrary.

3. The petitioner’s mother, Smt. B. Mercy Majula Vani, Physical Education Teacher in the E.C.M Aided School, Kurnool, died in harness on 18.05.2020. The petitioner made representation to the District Educational Officer, Kurnool District i.e., the 4th respondent seeking employment on compassionate grounds. The Deputy Educational Officer, Kurnool District i.e., the 5th respondent vide Rc.No.306/Dveoknl/2020, dated 21.12.2020 (Ex.P.2) submitted a report to the 4th respondent, who, in turn, forwarded the same to the Regional Joint Director of School Education, Kadapa District i.e., the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent vide Rc.No.02417/B1/2021, dated 09.08.2021 (Ex.P.1) directed the 4th respondent to examine the issue and submit remarks/recommendations as per G.O.Ms.No.11, (SE.PS) Department, dated

02.02.2018 and subsequent proceedings/Memos.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in pursuance of Ex.P.1, no report has b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top