SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 23239

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
PANTADI LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


APHC010579752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30262/2024 Between:

Pantadi Lakshmi and Others ...PETITIONER(S)

AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. MARELLA SRILAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations

2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)

3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Mandamus, for the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representation made by Petitioners on 10.12.2024 seeking permission to raise the construction and on the contrary preventing them from visiting the property i.e., all that Plot admeasuring 44.84, 52.74 and 64.17 sq.yards forming part of Town Survey No.40 situated at Yetimoga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top