SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 23413

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr V R K KRUPA SAGAR
INAKOLLU VENKATESWARLU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
CRLP 6934/2024



THE HON’BLE JUSTICE Dr. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.6640, 6702, 6734, 6802 and 6934 of

2024

COMMON ORDER:

1. The Criminal Petition No.6640 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.3 - Sri Kanthi Rana Tata, I.P.S., IGP, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C.

and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

2. Sri S.Sriram, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor and Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State submitted arguments. Sri Prabhunath Vasireddy and Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, the learned counsels for respondent No.2 submitted arguments. The counters are filed on behalf of respondent No.1 and 2.

3. The Criminal Petition No.6702 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.5 – Sri M.Satyanarayana, Inspector of Police, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C.

and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

4. Sri Vinodh Kumar Deshpande, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri Aneel Kumar Dasari, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor, Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State submitted arguments. Sri Prabhunath Vasireddy and Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, the learned counsels for respondent No.2 submitted arguments. The counters are filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.

5. The Criminal Petition No 6734 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.6 – Sri Vishal Gunni, I.P.S., D.I.G., seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C.

and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

6. Sri O.Manohar Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri P.Raj Kumar, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor, Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State submitted arguments and counter is filed on behalf of respondent No.1/State.

7. The Criminal Petition No 6802 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.4 – Sri K.Hanumantha Rao, D.S.P., seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C.

and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

8. Sri V.Pattabhi, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri K.L.N. Swamy, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top