SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24055

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Madireddy Brahmam Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


APHC010200262024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3483]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WRIT PETITION NO: 10181/2024 Between:

Madireddy Brahmam Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K VARUN SHYAM KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

3. GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS

4. S PRANATHI CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 20.01.2025 ORDER (Per Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati)

Through this writ petition, the writ petitioner sought to challenge the action of the respondents in not escalating/adjusting the price of steel, cement, labour and other materials as per G.O.Rt.No.111, T, R&B Department, dated 28.02.2024, G.O.Ms.No.94, T, R&B Department, dated 16.04.2008 and G.O.Ms.No.35, T, R&B Department, dated 30.01.2009 for the work covered under L.S.Agreement C.R.No.61/2020-21 entered into between the petitioner and respondent no.3, dated 23.12.2020.

2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was the successful bidder of the e-procurement Tender Notice no.38/T.O/2020-21, dated 09.09.2020 called for the purpose of const

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top