SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24072

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
Dr.P.V.Seetharama Raju – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


APHC010573662012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14272/2012 Between:

Dr.p.v.seetharama Raju, ...PETITIONER AND Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D GOVERDHANACHARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

3. P GOPALA KRISHNA

4. B SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY The Court made the following Order:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The grievance in the writ petition is that the respondents are not extending the age of superannuation from 58 to 65 years as mandated by the University Grants Commission Regulations dated 30.06.2010. The petitioner was working as a teaching faculty in various colleges in the State.

3. The petitioner is being paid the University Grants Commission Scales. He claims that the age of superannuation should also be extended in accordance with the guidelines of the University Grants Commission and regulations of the University Grants Commission dated 30.06.2010. The present Writ Petition was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top