HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
SRIKOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 1193/2025
APHC010020662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1193/2025 Between:
Srikoundinya Educational Society and others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 1193 of 2025
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in refusing to ratify the list of following students Sujit Kumar Yadav (Automobile Engineering), Lakkunta Murari (Computer Engineering), Shrawan Kumar (Electrical and Electronics Engineering), Rohit Kumar (Electrical and Electronics Engineering), Sanny Kumar (Electrical and Electronics Engineering), Sourabh Kumar (Electrical and Electronics Engineering), Abhay Kumar (Electrical and Electronics Engineering) total 07 students, who were admitted by the 2nd petitioner, who belongs to other states for the academic year 2024-2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Presidential Order 1974, and further direct the respondents to consider all the admissions made by the 2nd petitioner in left over seats as valid and approve the admissions made by the petitioners and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of the justice.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that when the similar issue came up before this Court in W.P.No.1511 of 2024, this Court disposed of the said writ petition basing upon the common orders, dated 20.11.2009 passed in W.P.No.24581 of 2009 and batch and learned counsel requested to pass similar order in this writ petition.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not refute the said submission.
5. In view of the said representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of W.P.No.24581 of 2009, dated 20.11.2009. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order dated
20.11.2009 passed in W.P.No.24581 of 2009 to this order.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________
JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 22.01.2025 SPP THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1193 of 2025 Date : 22.01.2025 SPP
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.