SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24340

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
BALLA CHANDRIKA – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


APHC010018912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 1022/2025 Between:

Balla Chandrika ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations

2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:

The Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the construction of Ground + first floor being raised by the Petitioner over the premises bearing Municipal No.D.No.3-16-1/3 of Rajyalakshmi Nagar Street/Colony, Godarigunta Area, Kakinada District (Erstwhile East Godavari District), Andhra Pradesh in pursuance of the building permit granted by the authorities and further trying to pull down the structures in a high handed manner, without ev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top