HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Smt. Mummana Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
APHC010175152014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 18298/2014 Between:
Smt. Mummana Varalakshmi, and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND The District Collector and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. D SATYAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
3. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
The Court made the following order:
The Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 2nd and 3rd Respondent without issuing the notice to the petitioners demolished the staircase of the house which is under construction and warned the petitioners to demolish the entire house even thou he is not competent authority which is illegal unjust, unfair against principals of the natural justice under article 14, 16, 21 of the constitution of India.
(a) Consequently, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.