SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24614

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
GUDE RAMU – Appellant
Versus
BANDAM DEMUDU – Respondent


APHC010413792024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 2186/2024 BETWEEN:

Gude Ramu and Others ...Petitioner(s)

AND Bandam Demudu and Others ...Respondent(s)

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. M BALASUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. ADAPA S BHIMASANKARA RAO

2. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Petitioners herein filed I.A. No. 486 of 2022 in O.S. No. 126 of

2018 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kothavalasa, to add them as party defendants in the suit and the said application was dismissed by the learned Junior Civil Judge vide order dated 29.04.2024 observing that it is only a bare contention of the petitioners that they are the necessary parties, however they have not filed any document and the proposed parties are neither shareholders nor have any rights, merely as a tenant they are not necessary parties and the application is filed to circumvent the law and in their absence, the Court can effectively adequately deliver the judgment.

2. It is very well settle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top