SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 25773

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Macha Bhaskar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


APHC010656852016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 23838/2016 Between:

Macha Bhaskar ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P SHASHI KIRAN

2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)

3. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)

The Court made the following:

ORDER

The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not permitting the petitioner to continue construction work pursuant to the undated notice issued by the 2nd respondent and not considering the representation dated 07.07.2016 of the petitioner as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, contrary to provisions of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and rules framed there under and offends articles 14, 21 and 30

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top