SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 25861

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
NUTHALAPATI SRINIVASA RAO – Appellant
Versus
NAMBURU SUDHA RANI – Respondent


APHC010450332024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3206]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2418/2024 Between:

Nuthalapati Srinivasa Rao ...PETITIONER AND Namburu Sudha Rani and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. NUTHALAPATI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following order:

The petitioner herein had filed O.S.No.23 of 2023, before the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guntur, for partition of the suit schedule property against the four defendants. The 3rd defendants had been set ex parte by an Order, dated 23.06.2023. Thereafter, the 3rd defendant, who is the 1st respondent herein, had moved an I.A.No.502 of 2023 under Order 9 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, for setting aside the ex parte Order, dated 23.06.2023. This application was contested by the petitioner herein on the ground that, the application for setting aside ex parte order is not bonafide and the applicant/3rd respondent herein, has been misusing the lenience of the Court.

2. The petitioner contende

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top