SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 25993

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
BheemineniSankar Naidu @ Jaggaiah – Appellant
Versus
Pothugunta Mangamma – Respondent


APHC010417622003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3369]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 854/2003 Between:

Bheeminenisankar Naidu @ Jaggaiah and Others ...APPELLANT(S)

AND Pothugunta Mangamma and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY

1. N M KRISHNAIAH The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT:

Smt. Vallabhaneni Santhi Sree, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appellants are not coming forward despite their best efforts to contact them.

2. It seems that appellants have no interest to prosecute the appeal.

3. Considering the submissions made, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________________

07 S.A.NO: 854/2003

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top