SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 26383

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Chitirala Madhuri – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


APHC010061422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.3381 of 2025 Between:

Chitirala Madhuri ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and another ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

2. A.S.C. BOSE, STANDING COUNSEL The Court made the following:

ORDER :

This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner over her property i.e. 17 sq. yards of land along with a RCC shop no.2 (GF-2), Door No.5-55-80, Rohini Arcade Apartment, 4/19 Brodipet, Guntur City, and initiating steps to demolish the said property of the petitioner without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 and its staff not to inter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top