SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 26399

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
T X AJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


APHC010063452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3331]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3592/2025 Between:

T X Ajay Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services appeared for respondents 1 to 3.

2. The petitioner, Inspector of Police, filed the above writ petition to declare the action of the respondent in not concluding the disciplinary proceedings in pursuance of the charge memo vide C.No.25/PR/2020 dated 25.07.2020 and further not considering his case for promotion due to pendency of the aforementioned charge memo, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. A charge memo vide C.No.25/PR/2020 dated 25.07.2020 (Ex.P.1) was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner submitted a written defence and thereafter, the Inquiry Officer was appointed. The Inquiry Officer submitted his report vide C.No.25/PR/2020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top