SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18469

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Emandi Santamma – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent


APHC010437272021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 272/2021 Between:

1. E MANDI SANTAMMA, W/O LATE NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURAL LABOUR R/O H.NO. 1-25, PADMASHALI STREET, GANGANNAPADU VILLAGE, TERLAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT AND

1. T HE UNION OF INDIA, Rep. by the General Manager, East Coast Railway, Bhuvaneswar.

...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersappellant begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Misc. Appeal, having been aggrieved by the Judgment dt. 16-7-2021 passed in O.A.II (U) No. 132 of 2013 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati Bench at Guntur Counsel for the Appellant:

1. P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent:

1. K KRISHNA BUSHAN CHOWDARY(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)

The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT:-

Aggrieved by the dismissal of the claim application filed by the appellant/applicant in OA II (U)No.132 of 2013 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati bench vide judgment dated 16.07.2021, this civil miscella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top