HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Emandi Santamma – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
APHC010437272021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 272/2021 Between:
1. E MANDI SANTAMMA, W/O LATE NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURAL LABOUR R/O H.NO. 1-25, PADMASHALI STREET, GANGANNAPADU VILLAGE, TERLAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. T HE UNION OF INDIA, Rep. by the General Manager, East Coast Railway, Bhuvaneswar.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersappellant begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Misc. Appeal, having been aggrieved by the Judgment dt. 16-7-2021 passed in O.A.II (U) No. 132 of 2013 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati Bench at Guntur Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K KRISHNA BUSHAN CHOWDARY(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:-
Aggrieved by the dismissal of the claim application filed by the appellant/applicant in OA II (U)No.132 of 2013 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravati bench vide judgment dated 16.07.2021, this civil miscella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.