SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18497

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
A NAGESWARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 5186/2026



APHC010088952026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3208]

AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 5186/2026 Between:

1. A NAGESWARA RAO, S/O.CHAINDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT

62 YEARS, FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DBCSCS LTD, R/O.DOOR NO.5-3-37, NEAR BONAKAL X ROAD, PAKABANDA BAJAR, ROAD NO.2, KHAMMAM TOWN, KHAMMAM DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. 507001.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 522238.

2. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.BACKWARD CLASSES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the suspension period of the petitioner from 20.09.2019 to 08.11.2021 (780 days) as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to treat the said suspension period as duty as per FR 54-B, taking note of the quashing of the disciplinary proceedings by order dated 08.12.2020 in W.P. No.18656 of 2020, which attained finality in W.A.No.522 of 2021 by order dated 08.09.2021, and further direct the respondents to pay 50 percent subsistence allowance differential, annual grade increments, and all consequential monetary and service benefits including arrears, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations submitted by the petitioner to the 1st respondent on 22.07.2025 and 20.11.2024, and to the 2nd respondent on 25.09.2024, within a time-bound period, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. T JANARDHAN REDDY

2. GP FOR SERVICES II THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 5186 of 2026 The Court made the following Order:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“… to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the suspension period of the petitioner from 20.09.2019 to 08.11.2021 (780 days) as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to treat the said suspension period as duty as per FR 54-B, taking note of the quashing of the disciplinary proceedings by order dated 08.12.2020 in W.P. No.18656 of 2020, which attained finality in W.A.No.522 of 2021 by order dated 08.09.2021, and further direct the respondents to pay 50 percent subsistence allowance differential, annual grade increments, and all consequential monetary and service benefits including arrears, and pass…”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-II.

3. The case of the petitioner is that, while he was working as a Executive Director in DBCSCS Limited, Prakasam District, , certain allegations were made against him. In pursuance of the said allegations, the respondent No.1 issued a G.O.Rt.No.261, BC Welfare (Vig-D) Department dated 20.09.2019 and placed the petitioner under suspension. The Petitioner was subsequently reinstated into service on 08.11.2021 and continued in service till retirement on 31.01.2024. The Petitioner made representations dated 22.07.2025 and 20.11.2024 to the First Respondent to treat the suspension period as on duty along with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top