Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Ravi Cheemalapati, J
SRI MATHANGI MATHA AGROS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SHRI SAURAB GAUR IAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of procedural history and allegations regarding cmr and pds rice diversion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. adjudication of pending writ petitions considering the pendency of statutory appeals. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. final closure of pending petitions and contempt case with specific directions for paddy supply. (Para 17 , 18) |
COMMON ORDER:
Questioning the action of respondent authorities in not supplying paddy to the petitioner for Custom Milling Rice (CMR) for the Rabi Marketing Season 2024-25, Writ Petition No.9446 of 2025 has been filed.
2. Challenging the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by respondent No.2, bearing Ref.No.CS1/17/RJY/2025 under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 with an intention to flout the orders of this Court dated 25.04.2025 in Writ Petition No.9446 of 2025, Writ petition No.13234 of 2025 has been filed.
3. Questioning the action of respondents in not supplying paddy to the petitioners for Custom Milling Rice (CMR), Writ Petition No.28564 of 2025 has been filed.
4. Contempt Case No.3240 of 2025 is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
