SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18863

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
KALAVALA SUJANA RANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 9771/2026



APHC010175122026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9771/2026 Between:

1. KALAVALA SUJANA RANI, W/O. K. SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/739, C.B.ROAD, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 545411. 2

2. . KANCHARLA KAMBAGIRI SWAMY,, S/O.K. KONDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/868, THIKKARAMAYYA MATAM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411.

3. CHOWDAM BHAGYALAKSHMI, W/O. CH. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,R/O.D.NO.4/889, RAGITHOTAPALEM TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411.

4. TELIKI PEDDA HUSSAIN, S/O. LATE TELIKI NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/894, RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -

545411.

5. M. NARASIMHULU,, S/O.M.KESANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/888, RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411.

6. VADDI BHAGYALAXMI,, W/O. LATE VADDI OBULESU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/899, RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411. 7.

7. KANCHARLA RAMANJANEYULU,, S/O. K. VIJAYA KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/866 RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411. 8.

8. PUJARI ROOPAVANI,, W/O. P. KESAVULU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/892, RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411.

9. JINKA RANGAPPA,, S/O. LATE J. BALACHANDRAYUDU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/869, RAGITHOTAPALEM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411.

10. P . SREENIVASULU,, S/O. P. LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT

52 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/892, THIKKARAMAYYA MATAM, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, A.P - 545411.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. T HE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522239

2. T HE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522239.

3. T ADIPATRI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515411.

4. T HE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ROAD NO.

1, GANGA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, A.P. - 515004

5. T HE ASSISTANT COMNNISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ROAD NO. 1, GANGA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, A.P. -

515004.

6. T HE DISTRICT ENDOWMENT OFFICER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ROAD NO.1, GANGA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, A.P.515004.

7. T HE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515411.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS challenging the action of the 4THto 7TH Respondents herein in trying to interfere with the Petitioners peaceful possession and demolish the Petitioners properties bearing D.No.4/884, D.No.4/868, D.No.4/889, D.No.4/890, D.No.4/890-1 D.No.4/894, D.No.4/888, D.No.4/899, D.No.4/868, D.No.4/892-2, D.No.4/869, D.No.4/892 i.e.. Subject Properties situated in Tadipatri Municipality, Tadipatri Town, Ananthapuram District, A.P i.e., Subject Properties, without issuing any notice, without considering dated.27.02.2026, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to principles of Natural Justice, provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 and the Andhra Pradesh Charitable And Hindu Religious Institutions And Endowments Act, 1987 besides being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners subject properties i.e. D.No.4/884, D.No.4/868, D.No.4/889, D.No.4/890, D.No.4/890-1, D.No.4/894, D.No.4/888, D.No.4/899, D.No.4/868, D.No.4/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top