SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18925

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
D Ramesh, J
Sri Pappu Hari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 10968/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Harinath Reddy Somagutta
For the Respondents: GP For Services I

The Court held that a petitioner's case for promotion should be considered based on requisite qualifications and applicable government orders, and any pending disciplinary enquiries should be concluded in a timely manner as per established administrative guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Promotion - Pending Disciplinary Proceedings - Consideration for promotion to the post of Tahsildar should be conducted in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257, and any pending enquiries must be concluded as per the guidelines stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.91. (Para 6)

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to be considered for promotion to the post of Tahsildar despite the issuance of a charge memo based on old allegations.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges the denial of promotion due to a pending charge memo based on old allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court directs consideration for promotion per g.o.ms.no.257 and conclusion of enquiry per g.o.ms.no.91. (Para 5 , 6)

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar from the post Deputy Tahsildar though he is fully eligible, qualified and within the Zone of consideration except pending charge memo issued in CCLAs Procg.No.REV02- 28021/14/2025 (C.No.2791400 ) dt 18-05-2025 of 2nd respondent which was issued based on a minor allegations detected way back on 20.07.2021 as illegal as arbitrary and violative of G.O. Ms. No. 91 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated 12.09.2022 and Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioners case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar, Zone-1 without reference to Charge Memo issued in CCLAs Procg.No.REV02-28021/14/2025 (C.No.2791400 ) dt 18- 05-2025 of 2nd respondent in terms of Para-5 (B) (i) of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated 10.06.1999 and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2''‘‘ respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Tahsildar from the post Deputy Tahsildar Paia-5 (B) (i) of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated;10.06.1999without reference to the charge memo issued in CCLA’s Procg.No.REV02-28021/14/2025 (C.No.2791400 ) dt 18- 05-2025 of 2nd respondent and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 10968 of 2026

The Court made the following Order:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“… to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar from the post Deputy Tahsildar though he is fully eligible, qualified and within the Zone of consideration except pending charge memo issued in CCLAs Procg.No. REV02- 28021/14/2025 (C.No.2791400 ) dt 18-05-2025 of 2nd respondent which was issued based on a minor allegations detected way back on 20.07.2021 as illegal as arbitrary and violative of G.O.Ms.No.91 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated 12.09.2022 and Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioners case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar, Zone-1 without reference to Charge Memo issued in CCLAs Procg.No.REV02-28021/14/2025 (C.No.2791400 ) dt 18-05-2025 of 2nd respondent in terms of Para-5 (B) (i) of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (SER.C) Dept dated 10.06.1999 and pass…”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-II.

3. A charge memo vide CCL’s Proceedings No.REV02- 28021/14/2025 (C.No.2791400) dated 18.05.2025 was issued to the petitioner framing charges. The petitioner submitted a written explanation 09.06.2025 urging the authorities to drop further proceedings. Despite the same the respondent authorities are not consider the case of the petitioner for promotion in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 dated 10.06.1999 on the ground of initiation of enquiry against the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top