HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
S. SIRISHA – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
CRLP 3240/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:19265
APHC010209562026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3396]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3240/2026
Between:
1. S. SIRISHA, D/O S. RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. H. NO.
48-2, BUDHAWARAPETA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
2. P. MUNEMMA, W/O S. RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. H.
NO. 48-2, BUDHAWARAPETA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, THROUGH S.H.O., KANAGANAPALLI POLICE STATION,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP - 518003.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. K.V. RAGHU VEER
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
ORDER
The instant petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused
Nos.1 & 2, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.22 of 2026 on
the file of Kanaganapalli Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District, which is
registered for the offence under Section 108 read with 3(5) of BNS.
2. Heard Sri K.V.Raghuveer, learned counsel for the Petitioners / Accused
Nos.1 and 2 and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, Assistant Public Prosecutor for State /
Respondent.
##PAGE2##2026:APHC:19265
2
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that Petitioner No.1
completed her MBBS and Petitioner No.2 is working in the Department of
Biochemistry as non-medical demonstrator in Kurnool Medical College. Learned
counsel would further submit that the deceased used to phone Petitioner No.1
and insist her to marry him for which she refused. On coming to know the same,
Petitioner No.2, who is the mother of Petitioner No.1 called the mother of the
deceased and asked her to make the deceased to stop following Petitioner No.1.
But, the deceased did not stop torturing Petitioner No.1. It is further submitted
that the deceased had several debts. It is further contended that there is no
abetment on the part of the Petitioners. Learned counsel would further contend
that the Petitioners are woman and are in dignified professions and they are
ready to furnish sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of the Court. Hence, prayed
to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners.
4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and submits that
there are specific allegations against the Petitioners. It is further submitted there
are no grounds to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners, at this stage. Hence,
prayed for dismissal of the petition.
5. Considering the submissions made on either side, and upon perusal of the
material available on record, this Court is of the view that the allegations made
against the Petitioners indicate that the deceased was allegedly insisting upon
Petitioner No.1 to marry him, which she declined. The material further suggests
that Petitioner No.2, being the mother of Petitioner No.1, had intervened by
requesting the family of the deceased to restrain him from such conduct. The
element of abetment to commit suicide is prima facie absent in this matter. The
##PAGE3##2026:APHC:19265
3
suicide note of the deceased coupled with the contents of the complaint would
show that the mother of the deceased had taken treatment in the hospital and in
that view, the deceased had taken the phone number of Petitioner No.1 and used
to be in contact with her. The mater is under investigation. Custodial
interrogation of the Petitioners is not required in this matter.
6. Taking into consideration the nature of accusations, the role attributed to
the Petitioners, the prima facie absence of specific overt acts constituting
abetment, and the fact that the Petitioners are women and stated to be in
respectable professions, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail, subject to
conditions, as the custodial interrogation of the Petitioners
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.