IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
2026:APHC:19202
WRIT PETITION NO: 34299/2012
APHC010260882012
Between:
1. J .S.V.PRASAD,, S/O.LATE GOPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: ATTENDER (UNDER REVERSION), SRI THIRUPATAMMA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, PENUGANCHIPROLU (V&M), KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD.
2. T HE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI TIRUPATAMMA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, PENUGRANCHIPROLU(V&M) , KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. S RI TIRUPATAMMA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PENUGRANCHIPROLU (V&M), KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JESHTADI SUNIL KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR)
2. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments
3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
4. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, a) Declaring the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in R.C.No. B1/788/2009 dt. 08.10.2012 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to law and provisions contained in Sec. 29,35, 41 of Act 30/87 and the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institution and Endowment Office Holders and Servant Service rules 2000 and set aside the same, b) and consequentially declare that the Petitioner is entitled to be continued as Attender at the 3rd Respondent institution in pursuance of proc.in R.C.No.B1/788/2009 dt.10.12.2009 of the 2nd Respondent and is entitled for all consequential service benefits there upon at the ri Respondent institution i.e. Sri Thirupatamma Ammavari Devasthanam, Penugranchiprolu V&M) , Krishna District.
IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 43621 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in R.C.No. B1/788/2009 dt. 08.10.2012
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 325 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt: 02/11/2012 made in WPMP.No.43621/ 2012 in WP.No. 34299/ 2012 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 10653 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the State of Andhra Pradesh; rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments Department), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad as Respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.34299/ 2012 and in W.P.M.P. No.43621 / 2012 in the interest of Justice
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 49473 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim suspension orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.43621/2012 in W.P.No.34299/2012 dated 02.11.2012 and dismiss the writ petition as devoid of merits and pass such other order / orders
ORDER:
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings dated 08.10.2012 issued by the 2nd respondent, which cancel the appointment of the petitioner as an Attender.
2. The petitioner's father was working as a cow keeper in the 3rd respondent Devasthanam and served for about six years. The petitioner’s father passed away on 03.05.2000 while in service of the respondent No.3. Soon after, the petitioner was initially engaged as a casual labourer on a daily wage basis. Thereafter, the petitioner was paid consolidated monthly payment of Rs.1,200/-, which was increased to Rs.1,500/- per month with effect from 03.03.2007. The petitioner completed SSC in the year 1991 and submitted a representation dated 13.09.2009 to the Executive Officer of respondent No.3, requesting appointment as an Attender in an existing regular vacancy earmarked for the Scheduled Castes. The Board of Trustees of respondent No. 3 passed a resolution on 13.11.2009, resolving to appoint employees working who had been working for several years on a regular basis, subject to their eligibility. The 2nd respondent, in pursuance of the said resolution, issued proceedings dated 10.12.2009, duly appointing the petitioner as an Attender in the existing vacancy earmarked for a Scheduled Caste candidate. The petitioner has been working ever since the said regular appointment. However, the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings dated 10.08.2012, also issued orders implementing the contributory
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.