HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Annapurna Reddyrajasekhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WP 8980/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:20674
APHC010168702026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3330]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 8980/2026
Between:
1. A NNAPURNA REDDYRAJASEKHAR REDDY, S/O. CHIMPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 3-78/1, NAMBURU VILLAGE,
PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -
522508.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. U NION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY
OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, NEW
DELHI-110001
2. I DBI BANK LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND
CEO, IDBI TOWER, WTC COMPLEX, CUFFE PARADE, MUMBAI -
400005
3. T HE BRANCH MANAGER, IDBI BANK LTD., GOVERNORPET
BRANCH, DOOR NO. 27-37-20, SAMBHAV ENCLAVE,
RAJAGOPALACHARI STREET, VIJAYAWADA - 520002.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of
Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in refusing to
release the pledged gold ornaments (380.500 grams) under Gold Loan
Account No. 0151671100095141 upon payment of the total outstanding dues
##PAGE2##2
20T2R6:RA,JP HC:20674
W.P.No.8980 of 2026
as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to Law and violative of principles of natural
justice and violative of Articles and 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India
consequently direct the Respondents to accept the total outstanding amount
of 20,43,247/- (with interest up to date of payment) and simultaneously
release/return the pledged gold ornaments to the Petitioner and Pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to restrain the Respondents from proceeding with the public
auction/private sale of the gold ornaments scheduled for 30.03.2026 or any
subsequent date, pending disposal of this Writ Petition and pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. O UDAYA KUMAR (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
20T2R6:RA,JP HC:20674
W.P.No.8980 of 2026
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8980 OF 2026
ORDER:
Ms. V. Harshitha, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the
petitioner, represented that the writ petition has become/rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
__________________________________
JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 28.04.2026
PBS
##PAGE4##4
20T2R6:RA,JP HC:20674
W.P.No.8980 of 2026
77
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8980 of 2026
Date: 28.04.2026
PBS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.