SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 873

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
Gummadi Ratna Raju, S/o. Late Yesobu - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department - Respondent
I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2026 In/And Writ Petition No.23677 of 2025
Decided On : 05-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Venkata Ranjit Kumar Beeda.
For the Respondent: GP For Home, GP Municipal Admn And Urban Dev AP, Mattegunta Sudhir, Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps, M.P.Ps, Gram Panchayats.

ORDER :

On 28.04.2026, at the request of Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner (through online), this Court had adjourned the admission hearing to enable him to appear in-person before the Court on 04.05.2026. On 04.05.2026, none appeared for the Writ Petitioner even on second call. Today also none appeared for the Writ Petitioner even after third call is made at the end of the Board. Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, Ld. Senior Counsel briefed by Sri P. Vivek, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant in I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2026 has raised an objection as regards the conduct of the Writ Petitioner and insisted that the matter should be proceeded.

2. Heard Sri M. Srinu Babu, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for MAUD and Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Vivek, Ld. Counsel for the implead Applicant.

3. This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:

“It is therefore I respectfully prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ of Mandamus (or) any appropriate Writ, directing the Respondent No.2, for considering the representation dated 26.08.2025, and dispose it off at earliest in accordance with the Law, and consequently for restraining the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, from interfering with the Petitioners possession and enjoyment over the subject lands to an extent of Acres 4.00 cents situated in Sy.Nos. 8 (Acres 1.00 cents), 141/A/2 (Acres 1.00 cents) and in 264 (Acres 2.00 cents) under the limits of Velagapudi Revenue Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, and to grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble may deem fit and proper in to these circumstances of the case in the interest of Justice.”

4. Basing on the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, this Court had passed the following interim Order on 09.09.2025.

“The petitioner………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………...

In the meanwhile, there shall be an interim direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land.”

5. Thereafter, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026 are filed by an Applicant seeking impleadment as Respondent No.5 and also for vacating the Interim Order passed by this Court on 09.09.2025. These two Interlocutory Applications were heard at length on 09.04.2026. After hearing both the Applications at length, this Court had modified the earlier Interim Order dated 09.09.2025. This modified Order dated 09.04.2026 has a bearing in this Writ Petition, and therefore, the said Order is extracted in its entirety, which is as under:

“Heard Sri V.S.R. Anjaneylu, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Ranjit Kumar Beeda, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. Jouli Kavitha, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Sudhir, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.4 and Sri Posani Venteswarlu, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Vivek, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant seeking impleadment.

I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026

2. I.A.No.1 of 2026 is filed by the Applicant seeking to be impleaded as Respondent No.5 in this Writ Petition.

3. I.A.No.2 of 2026 is filed to vacate the interim order dated 09.09.2025 passed in W.P.No.23677 of 2025.

4. This Court has perused the Interim Order dated 09.09.2025. This Court has also perused the documents filed along with the above mentioned Interlocutory Applications. It is the submission of the Ld. Senior Counsel for the Applicant that the vendor of the Applicant herein i.e., one Smt. Namburu Sampurna has surrendered an extent of Ac.0.39 cents of land situated in Survey No.88 in Lingayapalem Village to the Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA) under the Land Pooling Scheme (LPS). The CRDA, after preparing a layout, has allotted Plot No.21 in Block-B6 in Survey No.58 of Velagapudi Village to an extent of 390 square yards in terms of LPS to Smt. Namburu Sampurna.It is the submission of the Applicant that the Applicant herein has purchased the said plot from Smt. Namburu Sampurna by way of Registered Sale Deed dated 23.11.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top