Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20367
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Nyapathy Vijay, J
SALN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 24870/2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vijay Mathukumilli
For the Respondents: GP for Higher Education, Vivekananda Virupaksha
A writ petition may be closed by the court when the petitioner's counsel submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the matter.
Headnote:The petitioner approached the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the first respondent as arbitrary and illegal for not notifying the tuition fees for MCA, BBA, and BCA courses as recommended by the second respondent. The petitioner contended that this failure disabled the institution from participating in admissions counselling, violating Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The primary issue was whether the court should direct the respondents to determine and notify the fee structure for the petitioner institution. However, the court did not examine the merits of the case as the petitioner's counsel submitted that no further orders were required. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. closure of the writ petition based on the petitioner's submission that no further relief is sought. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent, in not notifying the tuition fee as recommended by the 2nd Respondent, Regulatory Commission through E File no. 2955336 for MCA (Master of Computer Applications) and E File No. 2955348 for BBA (Bachelor of Business Administration) and BCA (and Bachelor of Computer Applications) and thereby disabling the Petitioner institution to participate in the ongoing admissions Counselling, as being arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to determine and notify the fee structure for the Petitioner institution and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 1st Respondent to notify the tuition fee towards the Petitioner institution as recommended by the 2nd Respondent vide E File no. 2955336 for MCA (Master of Computer Applications) and E File No. 2955348 for BBA (Bachelor of Business Administration) & BCA (and “Bachelor of Computer Applications) to the Petitioner-Institution for the block period 2025-26 to 2026-27, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
2. VIVEKANANDA VIRUPAKSHA
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition.
2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed.
3. No order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
